Criminal Jurisprudence of Bharat

















Vande Matram Friends!

Welcome to the blog series of Criminal Jurisprudence of Bharat. This is Index page of the blogs related to the criminal law in Bharat. before going further let us know the names of Old and New Criminal laws as follows:

1. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is old statute related to evidence, which is repealed by the new statute titled as Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

2. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 is old statute related to the Criminal Procedure to be followed by police and courts in Criminal matters, which is repealed by the new statute titled as Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

3. Indian Penal Code, 1860 is old statute related to various crimes and their respective punishments, which is repealed by the new statute titled as Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 

All the new statutes mentioned above came into force on 1st of July, 2024 when third Regime of Modi Government came into rule.

Criminal jurisprudence of Bharat is series of blogs related to the criminal laws of Bharat including new and old statutes. Your comments are welcomed, so feel free to comment your opinions. This series also contains blogs in Hindi based on the cases listed at the end under the heading of references.

Index

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 1 of #BSA: Short Title, Application and Commencement.

Section 2 of #BSA: Definitions

Comparison of definition of Evidence in IEA and BSA



Case Commentaries:

Confession of Accused



हिन्दी ब्लॉग्स:

लालच ने मित्रता को किया शर्मसार

आनंद और उत्सव के मौके पर अपराध



My Books on Criminal Jurisprudence:

You can download my books on Criminal Jurisprudence from following links:

कुछ अपराधियों का कोई भविष्य नहीं होता!



Keywords/Tags

#NewCriminalLaws, #LawOfEvidence, #Bharat, #CriminalJurisprudence, #BNS, #BNSS, #BSA, #IPC, #CRPC, #IEA,


References:

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Download pdf

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, Download pdf

Bilkis Yakoob Rasool Vs. Union of India

Bhagwant Singh vs Commissioner Of Police

Kashmira Singh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh








If you think that the information shared with you has added some drops of knowledge for you then please support me by scanning this QR code. 






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Legal interpretations from Ayodhya Verdict Part 8

Image
  =================== Jay Shree Ram! These are some notes from Ayodhya Verdict regarding legal interpretations of certain statutory provisions: Read more Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Principle as to personality of institutions.- Apart from natural persons and corporations, which are recognised by English law, the position under Hindu law is that if an endowments is made for a religious or charitable institution, without the instrumentality of a trust, and the object of the endowment is one which is recognised as pious, being either religious or charitable under the accepted notions of Hindu law, the institution will be treated as a juristic person capable of holding property. – Justice B K Mukhergea Upon making an endowment, the donor relinquishes all claims to the endowed property. The property now vests in the pious purpose at the heart of the endowment which is recognised as a legal person. The idol forms the material manifestation of th...
Read more

Forfeiture of Citizenship in USA

  UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs M/s. GANPATI DEALCOM PVT. LTD. Forfeiture of Citizenship in USA: The aforesaid proposition has also been confirmed by the House of Lords in R v. H, [2003] 1 ALL ER 497. 17.19 In Kennedy v Mendoza¬Martinez, 372 US 144 (1963), the Supreme Court of the United States, while concerned with the constitutionality of legislation that imposed forfeiture of citizenship on those who had left or remained outside the United States during wartime to evade military service, had laid down the following relevant factors to classify forfeiture law: (a) Whether the sanction involves an affirmative disability or restraint; (b) Whether it has been historically regarded as a punishment; (c) Whether it is only applicable where there has been a finding of scienter (that is, a finding that an act has been done knowingly and intentionally); (d) Whether its operation promotes the traditional retributive and deterrent aims of punishment; (e) Whether the behaviour t...
Read more

Legal Interpretation from Ayodhya Verdict Part 9

Image
  =================== Jay Shree Ram! These are some notes from Ayodhya Verdict regarding legal interpretations of certain statutory provisions: Read more Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8 Where there exists an express deed of dedication, the legal personality vests in the pious purpose of the founder. The idol is the material embodiment of the pious purpose and is the site of jural relations. There are instances of the submergence or even destruction of the idol inspite of which it has been held that the legal personality continues to subsist. Even if a testator were to make a dedication to a religious purpose but the idol did not exist at the time the dedication was made or the manifestation of the divine was not in the form of the idol, but in the form of some other object of religious significance, the legal personality would continue to vest in the pious purpose of the dedication itself. A Swayambhu deity is a manifestation of God tha...
Read more